ommand/ note
Command/ ornament
Command/ paragraphs
Command/ placecombinedlist
Command/ placefloat
Command/ placelistoffloats
Command/ placelistofsorts
Command/ placelistofsynonyms
Command/ placement
Command/ placepairedbox
Command/ placeregister
Command/ presetlabeltext
Command/ referenceformat
Comma
Hi,
I’m not sure if this is the intended behaviour of the system, but I want to
typeset “This is Figure 1.1 in Chapter A Good Story” in the attached minimal
example. However, setting up the referencing interaction to text, this typesets
“This is 1.1 in Chapter A Good Story”. The same holds
Hans Hagen wrote:
On 9-8-2010 12:22, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
\NC \in [x] \NC \in {left}[x] \NC \in {}{right}[x] \NC \in
{left}{right}[x] \NC \NR
I see no left or right in the first string in PDF output. Just
1\t1\t1\t1.
sure, as \in has no left and right (nor a setup)
On 9-8-2010 9:17, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
Hans Hagen wrote:
On 9-8-2010 12:22, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
\NC \in [x] \NC \in {left}[x] \NC \in {}{right}[x] \NC \in
{left}{right}[x] \NC \NR
I see no left or right in the first string in PDF output. Just
1\t1\t1\t1.
sure,
Hans Hagen wrote:
On 9-8-2010 9:17, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
Hans Hagen wrote:
On 9-8-2010 12:22, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
\NC \in [x] \NC \in {left}[x] \NC \in {}{right}[x] \NC \in
{left}{right}[x] \NC \NR
I see no left or right in the first string in PDF output. Just
Hi!
The following code:
\definereferenceformat[lem][text=Lemma]
\inlem[lem:mylemma]
produces just a number, no Lemma prefix. I've sent a patch to fix it a
while ago. Could you please apply it, or tell me why you don't want to apply
it?
--
Yury G. Kudryashov---
On 8-8-2010 2:44, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
Hi!
The following code:
\definereferenceformat[lem][text=Lemma]
\inlem[lem:mylemma]
produces just a number, no Lemma prefix. I've sent a patch to fix it a
while ago. Could you please apply it, or tell me why you don't want to apply
it?
because it
Hans Hagen wrote:
On 8-8-2010 2:44, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
Hi!
The following code:
\definereferenceformat[lem][text=Lemma]
\inlem[lem:mylemma]
produces just a number, no Lemma prefix. I've sent a patch to fix it a
while ago. Could you please apply it, or tell me why you don't want
On 8-8-2010 7:19, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
Hans Hagen wrote:
On 8-8-2010 2:44, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
Hi!
The following code:
\definereferenceformat[lem][text=Lemma]
\inlem[lem:mylemma]
produces just a number, no Lemma prefix. I've sent a patch to fix it a
while ago. Could you please
Hans Hagen wrote:
On 8-8-2010 7:19, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
Hans Hagen wrote:
On 8-8-2010 2:44, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
Hi!
The following code:
\definereferenceformat[lem][text=Lemma]
\inlem[lem:mylemma]
produces just a number, no Lemma prefix. I've sent a patch to fix it
a
On 8-8-2010 7:40, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
this is only one case (we also need labels, content, left and right to
work ok)
I uploaded a beta that handles the following as intended.
\starttext
\definereferenceformat [intesta] [left=(,right=),text=Whatever~]
\definereferenceformat [intestb]
Am 09.08.10 00:22, schrieb Yury G. Kudryashov:
I see no left or right in the first string in PDF output. Just
1\t1\t1\t1.
Try it again later, it takes always a while till the beta is in the
minimals.
Other strings work as expected except for ~ in text= field. In the earlier
versions ~ was
On 9-8-2010 12:22, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
\NC \in [x] \NC \in {left}[x] \NC \in {}{right}[x] \NC \in
{left}{right}[x] \NC \NR
I see no left or right in the first string in PDF output. Just
1\t1\t1\t1.
sure, as \in has no left and right (nor a setup)
taco wrote:
Hi,
Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
Another problem fixed by my patch:
\definereferenceformat[ineq][text=equation]
\starttext
\placeformula[first]
\startformula 1=1\stopformula
\ineq[first]
\stoptext
printed 1, not equation 1.
This problem is still there and needs fixing,
Hi!
Are there any automatic unit test for ConTeXt distribution? At least the bug
with referenceformat can be catched using something like
context test
pdftotext test.pdf test.txt
diff test.txt test.txt-good
And the bug with broken footnote can be catched using just context test
yes we have. At next ctx meeting i will show something.(post from mobile sorry)
On 6/5/10, Yury G. Kudryashov ur...@ya.ru wrote:
Hi!
Are there any automatic unit test for ConTeXt distribution? At least the bug
with referenceformat can be catched using something like
context test
pdftotext
Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
Hi!
I try the following:
\definereferenceformat[ineq][left=(,right=),text=Equation]
\starttext
\placeformula[first]
\startformula
2=2
\stopformula
In \in[first] ineq \ineq[first] in \in[first].
\stoptext
The result is:
2 = 2 (1)
In 1 ineq (1) in (1).
Hi,
Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
It seems that \ineq doesn't clear some variables, and the next \in uses
the previous format.
Please, apply the attached patch upstream. It fixed the problem for me.
This problem was already fixed in the latest (internal?) beta.
Another problem fixed by my
taco wrote:
Hi,
Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
It seems that \ineq doesn't clear some variables, and the next \in uses
the previous format.
Please, apply the attached patch upstream. It fixed the problem for me.
This problem was already fixed in the latest (internal?) beta.
I shall test once
Hi!
I try the following:
\definereferenceformat[ineq][left=(,right=),text=Equation]
\starttext
\placeformula[first]
\startformula
2=2
\stopformula
In \in[first] ineq \ineq[first] in \in[first].
\stoptext
The result is:
2 = 2 (1)
In 1 ineq (1) in (1).
It seems that \ineq doesn't clear some
On Sat, 5 Aug 2006, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
\def\myin[#1:#2]{
\expandafter\ifx\csname in#1\endcsname\relax
\writestatus{warning}{referenceformat in#1 not defined}
\in[#1:#2]
\else
\csname in#1\endcsname[#1:#2]
\fi}
And if you want to suppress unwanted spaces, you can
21 matches
Mail list logo
